No assumption should be made about the ordering of the elements returned by the various enumerators.
In particular, you cannot assume the elements are returned in the same order as they were inserted. Also,
you should not expect the XMap implementation to make use of a possibly existing strict ordering
defined on the domain of all possible key values.
You can create enumerators for the keys of the map, its values, and its key-value pairs.
In all cases, you can create an isolated enumerator, which works on a copy of the
map's content. Such an iterator is not affected by changes done to the map after creation of
the enumerator.
On the contrary, an enumerator which is non-isolated works directly on the map data.
This is less expensive than an isolated enumerator, but means that changes to the map while
an enumeration is running potentially invalidate your enumerator. The concrete behavior in this
case is undefined, it's up to the service implementing the XEnumerableMap interface
to specify it in more detail.
Implementations of this interface might decide to support only isolated enumerators, or
only non-isolated enumerators. Again, it's up to the service to specify this. Requesting an
enumerator type which is not supported will generally result in an ::com::sun::star::lang::NoSupportException
being thrown.